On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:
> A router will have no use of this feature, not sure you need to spend > time trying this ;) It's not yer ordinary router... A cerowrt router has iperf, netperf/netserver from svn with congestion control switching and classification setting, rsync (with same), samba, transmission, a polipo proxy, scamper, and a legion of other network analysis tools on-board and available as optional packages. and it's used in the bufferbloat project as a thoroughly understood platform for originating, receiving, AND routing packets on a real embedded home gateway platform that end users actually use, through a decent set of drivers, on ethernet and wifi. I am always concerned when changes to the stack like GSO/GRO/BQL/fq_codel go into linux - or things like the infinite window in ECN bug from a few months back happen - as they hold promise to mutate (or explain) the statistics and analysis we've accumulated over the last year and a half. And as I'm hoping to do a major test run shortly to get some fresh statistics vs a vs fq_codel vs the old sfqred tests ( I'm looking forward to redoing this one in particular: http://www.teklibre.com/~d/bloat/hoqvssfqred.ps - ) ... and you are about to change what those stats are going to look like, under load, with this change... I kind of need to understand/track it/parse it/capture it. I've got sufficient hardware now to easily A/B things. (sorry for the noise on the lists) -- Dave Täht _______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
