On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:13 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This introduce TSQ (TCP Small Queues)
>
> TSQ goal is to reduce number of TCP packets in xmit queues (qdisc &
> device queues), to reduce RTT and cwnd bias, part of the bufferbloat
> problem.
>
> sk->sk_wmem_alloc not allowed to grow above a given limit,
> allowing no more than ~128KB [1] per tcp socket in qdisc/dev layers at a
> given time.
>
> TSO packets are sized/capped to half the limit, so that we have two
> TSO packets in flight, allowing better bandwidth use.
>
> As a side effect, setting the limit to 40000 automatically reduces the
> standard gso max limit (65536) to 40000/2 : It can help to reduce
> latencies of high prio packets, having smaller TSO packets.
>
> This means we divert sock_wfree() to a tcp_wfree() handler, to
> queue/send following frames when skb_orphan() [2] is called for the
> already queued skbs.
>
> Results on my dev machine (tg3 nic) are really impressive, using
> standard pfifo_fast, and with or without TSO/GSO. Without reduction of
> nominal bandwidth.
>
> I no longer have 3MBytes backlogged in qdisc by a single netperf
> session, and both side socket autotuning no longer use 4 Mbytes.
>
> As skb destructor cannot restart xmit itself ( as qdisc lock might be
> taken at this point ), we delegate the work to a tasklet. We use one
> tasklest per cpu for performance reasons.
>
>
>
> [1] New /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes tunable
> [2] skb_orphan() is usually called at TX completion time,
> but some drivers call it in their start_xmit() handler.
> These drivers should at least use BQL, or else a single TCP
> session can still fill the whole NIC TX ring, since TSQ will
> have no effect.
>
> Not-Yet-Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> ---
By the way, Rick Jones asked me :
"Is there also any chance in service demand?"
I copy here my answer since its a very good point:
I worked on the idea of a CoDel like feedback, to have a timed limit
instead of byte limit ("allow up to 1ms" delay in qdisc/dev queue.)
But it seemed a bit complex : I would need to add skb fields to properly
track the residence time (sojourn time) of queued packets.
Alternative would be to have a per tcp socket tracking array,
but it might be expensive to search a packet in it...
With multi queue devices or bad qdiscs, we can have reordering in skb
orphanings. So the lookup can be relatively expensive.
_______________________________________________
Codel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
