this would be better sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] do not decide on anything you are asking about, they only implement that which is asked for in the server's by the Server admins, with a select few implementing in X what CService asks for. considering invite only lets you invite yourself in, i do not see a reason why we cannot lower the access of the command... however it is not my decision to make. but i will bring it up. ;) -- Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network) Technician, Media Design School Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Undernet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Personal Disclaimer: this email is from my own thoughts and opinions and unless otherwise stated does not represent Undernet, CService, or Media Design School. > From: BRiTELiTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:36:56 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Coder-Com] a suggestion for a new X feature and a feature for Bots > > > > HI there, > > I've got an idea for a new (also easy to implementable) feature for the > channel service bot X. > > Some idiots on the net force us somethimes to set our channel to +im. > Okay, it is possible to get our regular visitors an auto voice with > no further Access on X, with just 1 Access point. > > The thing we dont like, is: X has not a user flag (please not a level), > that allows users to invite just theirselves (but not other users!!) in > the channel, if the channel mode is +i and they're not banned. > > So what about a user flag (that does not depend on a user level, because > not senseful in EVERY case) that lets users invite theirselves in a > channel? > > Before i get misunderstood: I'm not talking about an auto invite. > The problem at the moment is just, that there is no possibility to let > a user invite itself (and no one other!), if he's not banned. > > Surely clear: Would only have to work when the user is not banned. > > It's stretching our nerves if there opens 20 queries only asking for > invitation. I think, this could be practically for many channels. > > > Another idea i have is for bots. At the moment, the bot can recognize, > if a "mass join" is after a split, because a "merge" server notices. > As it's no more possible to get the user mode +s since the last time, > it would be great to tell some channel bots that there is split (and > of course, the re-merge, too!!!) thru a user mode? > > Just a notice, that there is coming a rejoin (and of course, a > resynch) within the next XX seconds or something... Anything that lets > the bot make a difference between a joining botnet and a resynching > split. > > Surely knows the bot, that there is split (other ppl are leaving with > *.split), but the bot cant figure out when the servers mergge, no bot > will recognize. Maybe you have an idea on how to implement that. > > With best regards, > > Undernet's BRiTELiTE from #germany > >
