----- Original Message -----
From: "Bin Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Rons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:32 PM
Subject: Re:Re: [Coder-Com] server response time is too slow when using LIST
command


> So do I have any solutions to turn off this feature?
>

I doubt it, it is 'hard coded'.  Why would you want to disable it anyway?
Normal IRC clients don't notice the delay.

> Thanks
>

   Regards,

  --
 Tom Rons ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
             (http://openircd.org/trons/)


> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bin Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 4:21 PM
> >Subject: [Coder-Com] server response time is too slow when using LIST
> >command
> >
> >
> >> To Whom It is Concern:
> >>
> >> I installed ircu2.10.10pl15 server on my linux box (Dell III, 600mHz,
> >256M), and wrote a small testing code using Java on my windows machine
> >(pentium III, 1G, 256M). There is a intranet setup. The functions of the
> >code were basically join a channel, and count how many people are in that
> >channel, then leave that channel. So I used JOIN, LIST, and PART command.
> >The testing code did a loop test of 8 channels named c1-c8 (new channels,
> >never exist before the join). The response time (in second) was as
> >following:
> >>    c1----1.192
> >>    c2----4.076
> >>    c3----5.097
> >>    c4----6.059
> >>    c5----6.058
> >>    c6----6.059
> >>    c7----6.059
> >>    c8----6.058
> >>
> >> The response time was apparently too slow. I just wonder is this
normal,
> >or I need to turn on some configuration switch, or is there any faster
> >command I can use instead of LIST, or...?
> >>
> >
> >You probably hit a 'feature'.  This is simply an artificial delay in the
> >LIST data that is sent, to prevent flooding people when they request
LIST,
> >which would otherwise cause them to get disconnected by or from the
server
> >if the list is rather large.  Try a requesting a LIST on IRCnet for
instance
> >and you will probably see what I mean.  Bahamut uses a similar mechnism,
> >that goes by the name 'SAFELIST'.
> >
> >> Thanks a lot.
> >>
> >> Bin Duan
> >>

Reply via email to