Yeah, I had heard something about this, but this more or less answers Stime's other query to me. My point was that the UserIP command *is* useful when someone is *spoofing* a user@host - I use it to verify hostnames etc - But given that Undernet has not implimented any system allowing a users host to be hidden (YET - Vampire-'s patch being the relavent one here) theres no need to rush into hiding the UserIP output either, which was my point.
Mark. At 13:35 30/01/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Vampire- made a patch for the new u2.10.11 for using the username youy use >in X to be your host... for example: BlakJak is >[EMAIL PROTECTED] The patch hasn't been added to >u2.10.11 yet, but their is a way to do hidden hosts. :) > >~reed >R33D33R@UnderNet > > >ircU as implimented on Undernet doesnt allow users hosts to be hidden.. so > >its not something I can see implimented any time soon, unless usermode +x > >becomes prolific? > > > > > > > >At 03:23 30/01/2002 +0100, stime wrote: > >>Hello, > >>I noticed things like /links and /stats are disabled. > >>Its a good thing, but... > >>You have forgotten to disable (make oper only) an important command: > >>/userip > >>Me and others users change their reverse after we connect to the server, > >>so kiddie's can't get our real ip with the /dns command, > >>but more and more kiddie's seem to know about the /userip command, > >>wich gives the the ip of the client when it connected to the server, the > >>real ip. > >>It would save a load of priceless bandwidth if this command would just be > >>oper only. > >> > >>Thanks for reading my idea/view :) > >> > >>Cya! > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
