I'll be brief, since I know this is only barely the forum for a discussion of this type... I would urge the admins to strongly consider creating another group to provide oversight to CSC if a system like this is implemented. There's way too much opportunity for abuse, and I know that CSC is overworked, underpaid, and deals with enough problems as it is. Some type of independent auditing group (Andersen is probably out of the picture) would be beneficial.
Though the chances of something like that making it into the code are probably slim-to-none as it is. :-) -Colin At 08:30 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, Py Fivestones wrote: >Wouldn't that mean that everyone would be forced to become a "member" of >cservice? If that's the case, then by default, your cservice name would >become your registered nick (since everyone would be required to register), >which isn't allowed here :P If you're saying that registering with cservice >and thus having a hidden ident, will be voluntary, we'll still end up with >the same scenario. Am I missing something here? If so, can you clue me in? >stoney`
