Six years ago ... and on Undernet for more than two before that. That isn't and wasn't the point of the post and you know it. If attempting to prove that I am wrong in how long I say I've been on the network gives you some personal satisfaction, you don't have enough to do.
Bob At 09:19 AM 3/29/2002 +0800, you wrote: >At 1:26 PM -0800 28/03/02, BobsKC wrote: >>Every once in a while.. even after 9 years here, I forget that I should >>never send anything to this list unless I'm prepared to suffer insults >>and comments about my technical idiocy ... This current round of >>graciousness by list members displaying their appreciation for someone >>trying to share information whether it be germane or worthless, won't be >>forgotten soon. >> >>Bob > >9 years? not too sure what you were doing for the other 3 years, but >here's an email from 6 years ago that you might remember... > >>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) id >>WAA19202 for cservice-out; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:15 -0400 >>Received: from sun.revealed.net (sun.revealed.net [205.243.76.6]) by >>puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) with ESMTP id WAA19196 for >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:13 -0400 >>Received: from [205.243.76.229] by sun.revealed.net (post.office MTA v1.9.3 >> ID# 0-13301) with SMTP id AAA28272 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> Tue, 6 Aug 1996 21:16:21 -0500 >>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: [Cservice] Cservice channel ops >>Date: Tue, 06 Aug 96 21:19:16 -0500 >>From: "Robert Arbuckle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03 >>Message-ID: <19960807021619.AAA28272@[205.243.76.229]> >>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Precedence: bulk >>X-UIDL: 9ea840c21074724f26f8ef24b3184f97 >>Status: U >> >>-- [ From: bobskc * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- >> >>Hello all, >> >>I was talking with Kev recently about security issues relative to pvt msgs >>and he suggested I write in regard to policy for receiving ops on the >>cservice channel. I >>have been helping there for some time now and often late at night or midday >>when few if any active ops are present. This open invitation to cause >>problems for the channel is often accepted by those who know they cannot be >>kicked/banned. >> >>Again, I do not know how long I need to be around before trust sets in but >>it has been at least a couple of months of regular service and another >>couple months of very part time help and a lot of learning time. I have my >>own channel and am very good with people but helping "naked" is a tough >>proposition. (Unless your name is NudeDude of course). :-> >> >>Not looking for any other status unless the Admins feel I am ready for it, >>just would like to be in control of my enviornment. (I have be op'd once in >>a while on a temporary basis but most helpers are unsure about doing this). >> >> >>Thank you for your time and consideration. >> >>Bob > >Laters, >-- > ___ | | ___ __ _| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ > <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-</ . \| ' | > <___||_|\___./\_\ \___|<___||__/_/ /__/\___/|_|_| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=- http://www.theducks.org/ > 4496760@ICQ > > "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, > I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 > weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
