ohh this is so joyful ...NOT ----- Original Message ----- From: "BobsKC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alex Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Fireball's info
> Six years ago ... and on Undernet for more than two before that. That > isn't and wasn't the point of the post and you know it. If attempting to > prove that I am wrong in how long I say I've been on the network gives you > some personal satisfaction, you don't have enough to do. > > Bob > > > At 09:19 AM 3/29/2002 +0800, you wrote: > >At 1:26 PM -0800 28/03/02, BobsKC wrote: > >>Every once in a while.. even after 9 years here, I forget that I should > >>never send anything to this list unless I'm prepared to suffer insults > >>and comments about my technical idiocy ... This current round of > >>graciousness by list members displaying their appreciation for someone > >>trying to share information whether it be germane or worthless, won't be > >>forgotten soon. > >> > >>Bob > > > >9 years? not too sure what you were doing for the other 3 years, but > >here's an email from 6 years ago that you might remember... > > > >>Received: (from majordom@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) id > >>WAA19202 for cservice-out; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:15 -0400 > >>Received: from sun.revealed.net (sun.revealed.net [205.243.76.6]) by > >>puck.nether.net (8.7.5/jared) with ESMTP id WAA19196 for > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:20:13 -0400 > >>Received: from [205.243.76.229] by sun.revealed.net (post.office MTA v1.9.3 > >> ID# 0-13301) with SMTP id AAA28272 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > >> Tue, 6 Aug 1996 21:16:21 -0500 > >>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: [Cservice] Cservice channel ops > >>Date: Tue, 06 Aug 96 21:19:16 -0500 > >>From: "Robert Arbuckle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>X-Mailer: E-Mail Connection v2.5.03 > >>Message-ID: <19960807021619.AAA28272@[205.243.76.229]> > >>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Precedence: bulk > >>X-UIDL: 9ea840c21074724f26f8ef24b3184f97 > >>Status: U > >> > >>-- [ From: bobskc * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- > >> > >>Hello all, > >> > >>I was talking with Kev recently about security issues relative to pvt msgs > >>and he suggested I write in regard to policy for receiving ops on the > >>cservice channel. I > >>have been helping there for some time now and often late at night or midday > >>when few if any active ops are present. This open invitation to cause > >>problems for the channel is often accepted by those who know they cannot be > >>kicked/banned. > >> > >>Again, I do not know how long I need to be around before trust sets in but > >>it has been at least a couple of months of regular service and another > >>couple months of very part time help and a lot of learning time. I have my > >>own channel and am very good with people but helping "naked" is a tough > >>proposition. (Unless your name is NudeDude of course). :-> > >> > >>Not looking for any other status unless the Admins feel I am ready for it, > >>just would like to be in control of my enviornment. (I have be op'd once in > >>a while on a temporary basis but most helpers are unsure about doing this). > >> > >> > >>Thank you for your time and consideration. > >> > >>Bob > > > >Laters, > >-- > > ___ | | ___ __ _| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _ > > <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-</ . \| ' | > > <___||_|\___./\_\ \___|<___||__/_/ /__/\___/|_|_| > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=- http://www.theducks.org/ > > 4496760@ICQ > > > > "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95, > > I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10 > > weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton > >
