> Now there we have a problem... Even if we know who did that, he is able to > use his handlehost (?.users.undernet.org) as a mask so we can't figure out > his userip. We won't be able to track him down any more, and his ISP can't > be warned of his abuse.
Undernet's AUP prohibits spamming, so you can email logs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It'll likely result in suspension of his account, and hopefully also a complaint from abuse@ to the user's ISP. This is clearly not as good as letting the user do this himself, but it's a trade-off we've made to add some privacy for our users. > With this feature, isn't it possible to use your users.undernet.org host as > the client looking in the channel? And if so, could it be possible to > capture multiple connections from one userip? Is it possible that if I ban > a certain handle, for exemple nicos.users.undernet.org, that that handle > (here nicos) isn't able to enter a channel where his undernet-username-host > is banned? Is there a way that the mode +x can help in this situation? Is > there a solution if abusers use that option? The user must be logged in. X will only allow MAXLOGINS simultaneous logins from a given username, and MAXLOGINS may not exceed 3. -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>