Since when can we have a server set usermodes ? On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] Michel Hubert wrote:
> --- Alex Badea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > I disagree with the umode +x behaviour. Imagine a client sends a /msgX > > login and a /mode +x upon connection. What will usually happen is the > > mode > > will be processed before the account message from X, so it just makes > > life > > more complicated. If we really must inform users about what's going > > on > > under their feet, we could send a server notice, or even a numeric > > when > > their host gets hidden. > > Since it's working with X why not +x mode be a toggle in the X config > for that user? Like X do the /mode +x on the user rather than the user > if it ask X to be +x by default (+x would not be the default) > > This still left the user to do it himself or remove it if he want it. > > ===== > Michel Hubert~_KcuTzZ_ - Oper on Montreal.qu.ca.Undernet.org -- Fre/Gen01/Genesis@Undernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.europop.be We the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.
