-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 Jan 2003 4:54 pm, The Storm Surfer wrote:
> a 'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be
> fixed? The RFC doesn't seem to say anything about any channel names being
> illegal.
It's not going to be "fixed" because it's not an error. Rather deliberate in
fact.
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Fk7/z8bl0gyT/hERAqwQAJ47h5Dt0LvBuiXy4yW6TCHidTuuIQCcCGnz
pcbA+fvMak69NTKMfwLw3HU=
=JK17
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
