Which in my opinion the command itself would be used to abuse too. Maybe somone does not like you and just use the command to give you a bad name etc etc.
And it`s not resource wise to do that kind of script to see the ip then to check the abuse email address from the internic etc and send the abuse mail. Ivan Degiorgio A.k.a. AiRMaFiA -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Da_QuiK Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] "Actual how on WHOIS"-crap It is possible to set up a PHP form to send an email to the abuser's ISP without revealing the IP to anyone, the PHP interface could be connected to a service on undernet and get the IP of the abuser, and then append it on the end of the email while the email itself can be written by the one who's reporting it. So the only thing the one who's reporting it would need is the users's nickname on undernet or you could also make a new command in gnuworld to report a users to an ISP - /msg X reportabuse <nickname> <explanation> - that way the service can get the name of the ISP by parsing it from the host or from the dns server and send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] this is a little far-fetched but i think it's the best way to implement something to report a user without reveiling his IP to the one who's reporting it Greetz, Thomas "Da_QuiK" Schueremans ----- Original Message ----- From: "Py Fivestones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Luzmu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 7:28 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] "Actual how on WHOIS"-crap > I'm against channel ops being able to see "through" hidden hosts. I would > however like to see an IRCops related channel where users can report > abusive users who are hiding behind the +X mode. I think we all agree, > newbies and large channels are most often the target of these abuses, and > it's not always possible to gather logs to send to abuse@, which will be > read long after the abusers have logged off. It would be great if victims > had a place to go to alert an IRCop who can catch the lamers in the act. > Any thoughts/comments? > stoney` > > At 03:12 PM 1/3/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >The reason why the x-mode was introduced was to prevent people fromg being > >able to attack you in many ways, if someone is breaking the law/abusing > >"hard" I am sure that undernet irc operators are more than happy to assist > >you to inform a persons ISP etc, there is no sain reason why suddenly > >channel ops should be able to see your real host (noor 400+'s etc etc..), > >also if this would to be added to cservice in some way it would just cause > >more stress to it and there is no idea in making some dedicated bot just for > >the purpose. If this would to be taken into use I can see a decrease in > >users in many of those big general kind of channels where you just hang out > >to time-to-time engage in interresting convresations. Also for undernet even > >to considder this it would be more than neccessary that the users get to say > >their oppinion, and I'm talking about EVERYONE. If you want this so bad go > >and set up a vote, otherwise just forget about it. There is no way to make > >it safe enough with all the autojoin on invite newbies (no offense, simply > >true) etc. This might just end up in dos kiddies attacking random people > >instead of the ones who actually _might deserve their hate_. > > > >I am but a peon but my word is to be taken seriously. > > > >-Luzmu > > Py Fivestones > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
