> > and for that matter why does it send crlf instead of just lf on > > server-server links this is also a waste of bandwidth and afaict no p10 > > implementation minds being sent just lf > > RFC specifies "\r\n", the original code base does "\r\n", clients have a > right to expect "\r\n", and it simplifies buffer size calculations. > However, at some point I hope to change the server-server protocol to a > binary protocol. This obviously would not extend to clients except > perhaps by a client-selectable extension in a far distant time and > probably another universe. > --
clients don't usually parse server-server protocol.
