On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 22:10 -0500, Michael Poole wrote: > Thank you for doing this. This patch looks good to me. Does anyone > have objections to it being committed for 2.10.12.10? For that > matter, does anyone else have other changes that need to go into > 2.10.12.10?
No objections here. -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
