potiuk commented on pull request #11157: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11157#issuecomment-699945380
> https://xkcd.com/927/ (devcontainer.json doesn't help for Pycharm or other IDEs.) There are already signs and rumours that IntelliJ works on their own integration with cloud dev machines based on similar principles. I'd love to also integrate Breeze with it when it comes out. I think they will have no choice when CodeSpaces go out of the beta. Everyone who I talked to who used CodeSpaces loves the simplicity it brings in being able to work from anywhere without setting up anything. I thin 2021 will be when we switch to cloud development for non-power users (i.e. casual contributors). Hopefully, those tools will converge eventually. I see Breeze as a common denominator that will be used by those who would not want to be tied with particular IDEs and a helper tool to automate tedious tasks (thanks to it I can test 5-10 different combinations of RC with different rbac/norbac/database/python versions in a matter of minutes (and with `start-airflow` command it will be much faster). > > The "not advertising it outside of dev list" answers my question, yes Do you have anything against if I add it to the docs of Airflow at some point in time that Breeeze is one of the ways of testing DAGs locally? We already have it, it's just a matter to point to the right (released) sources and docs. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
