dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19726#discussion_r763421227
##########
File path:
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/backcompat/backwards_compat_converters.py
##########
@@ -21,18 +21,16 @@
from kubernetes.client import ApiClient, models as k8s
from airflow.exceptions import AirflowException
-from airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.backcompat.pod import Port, Resources
-from airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.backcompat.pod_runtime_info_env import
PodRuntimeInfoEnv
-def _convert_kube_model_object(obj, old_class, new_class):
+def _convert_kube_model_object(obj, old_class_name, new_class):
Review comment:
> Of course I could remove mention of old class altogether so that user
is not even considering it
i'm not saying for certain that it should be removed, just taking a look and
trying to understand. i'll have a closer look at the code but in the meantime
don't consider my question a blocker.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
