jamescnowell commented on PR #31716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31716#issuecomment-1578859449

   I'm not able to spend that much time on changes like that right now. You can 
close this PR if it's not something you plan on accepting.
   
   I find it frustrating that non-backwards compatible changes are allowed into 
to "stable" API versions, as will many others. 
   
   For the "Some people may be relying on it" statement... while that is 
possible, the current version is fundamentally broken, so those people will 
have jobs that fail with no notification. I believe _most_ of those people will 
have ended up finding https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31183 as using 
the code provided in the examples errors out very quickly.
   
   I understand this is already a sticky situation and there are no good 
solutions, this is simply the solution that I had time for, that appeared to be 
in line with having stable API version numbers.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to