potiuk commented on PR #31716: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31716#issuecomment-1578882436
then maybe @blcksrx will have time to fix it since that was the #31183 change that broke it. Do you agree @blcksrx that this is "fundamentally broken" ? Can you please fix it @blcksrx ? I think if not then indeed we will have to rever it, unless someone provides a fix. > I find it frustrating that non-backwards compatible changes are allowed into to "stable" API versions, as will many others. Surely @jamescnowell . It is frustrating for everyone. But maybe you do not understand the perspective and OSS spirit - it might happen. Maybe you could better do it with 80 providers, 5000 or so operators and 30 commits merged a day and multiple thousands of tests to prevent such errors from happening. Airflow has 2500 contributors and you get it for absolutely free. There are many ways you and others can give back - spending time (as the 2500 contributors) is one of the ways - and I understand you do not have more of the time (but then maybe github Sponsorship or finding someone in your company - that uses the software for free) would be a good way to give back for the countless hours people spend on contributing to Airflow so that your company can use it for free. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
