eladkal commented on code in PR #33439: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33439#discussion_r1295965631
########## dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/provider_issue_TEMPLATE.md.jinja2: ########## @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release. Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers? +The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in + +[Verify providers by contributors](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors) Review Comment: Yeah totally separate PR. yes, we should have explnation of what we want to do, why we are doing it and how to actually do it. I think ideally breeze should handle it by it's own (thus making the paragraph we want to introduce now redundant) Something like: ``` breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.8 --backend postgres \ --load-example-dags --load-default-connections --override-default-provider-versions apache-airflow-providers-amazon==10.10.0rc1 ``` but that is a feature request for later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
