Dev-iL commented on code in PR #61491:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/61491#discussion_r2769809056
##########
airflow-core/src/airflow/migrations/versions/0033_3_0_0_add_tables_for_backfill.py:
##########
@@ -49,7 +48,7 @@ def upgrade():
sa.Column("dag_id", sa.String(length=250), nullable=False),
sa.Column("from_date",
airflow.utils.sqlalchemy.UtcDateTime(timezone=True), nullable=False),
sa.Column("to_date",
airflow.utils.sqlalchemy.UtcDateTime(timezone=True), nullable=False),
- sa.Column("dag_run_conf", sqlalchemy_jsonfield.jsonfield.JSONField(),
nullable=False),
Review Comment:
Why I think the present approach is justified:
1. The underlying data should not be affected at all, it's just the
python-level type hint that's changing - the DB internally stays exactly the
same.
2. If we don't modify this, how can we eliminate the import?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
