shahar1 commented on PR #70059: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70059#issuecomment-5020471054
> Hi @shahar1, > > From my perspective, the value of showing Lang-SDK entrypoint source is limited (please check the [#70059 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70059#discussion_r3612734439) comment for the code tab example if we support this feature) so the down side of this feature is more than the value. > > I can still raise the Dev List discussion if you feel the ADR here is not enough and we need more stakeholders on this decision. > > Thanks. > Hi @shahar1, > > From my perspective, the value of showing Lang-SDK entrypoint source is limited (please check the [#70059 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70059#discussion_r3612734439) comment for the code tab example if we support this feature) so the down side of this feature is more than the value. > > I can still raise the Dev List discussion if you feel the ADR here is not enough and we need more stakeholders on this decision. > > Thanks. > Hi @shahar1, > > From my perspective, the value of showing Lang-SDK entrypoint source is limited (please check the [#70059 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70059#discussion_r3612734439) comment for the code tab example if we support this feature) so the down side of this feature is more than the value. > > I can still raise the Dev List discussion if you feel the ADR here is not enough and we need more stakeholders on this decision. > > Thanks. I think that it's worth a discussion and lazy-consensus mainly due to the fact that it's a "no" decision which relates all SDKs, that will be hard to challenge in the future - so it should be scoped down exactly to why and what it negates. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
