[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17068630#comment-17068630
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-6399:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit c7a8a1d2309553d3930d0e204b978e372b9d307d in airflow's branch 
refs/heads/v1-10-test from Louis Simoneau
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=airflow.git;h=c7a8a1d ]

[AIRFLOW-6399] Serialization: DAG access_control field should be decorated 
field in DAG serialization (#7879)

Co-authored by: Louis Simoneau <simoneau.lo...@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Long Le Xich <codename...@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit 2d0db948f0bffa7077b4dd581d32cae6ad1aee0e)


> Serialization: DAG access_control field should be decorated field in DAG 
> serialization
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-6399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6399
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DAG, scheduler, webserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.7, 1.10.8
>            Reporter: Xich Long Le
>            Assignee: Xich Long Le
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.10.10
>
>
> When DAG serialization is enabled, if any DAG contain field: "access_control":
> - Scheduler will fail to schedule all jobs.
> - Webserver cannot browse those DAG with "access_control"
> Scheduler output:
> ValidationError: Additional properties are not allowed ('_access_control' was 
> unexpected)
> Failed validating u'additionalProperties' in 
> schema[u'allOf'][0][u'properties'][u'dag']
> Reason: 
> [https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.7/airflow/serialization/schema.json|https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.7/airflow/serialization/schema.json]
>  does not have access_control as a whitelisted field.
> AIRFLOW-6425 added '_access_control' to JSON schema but does not define it as 
> decorated_fields making the field to serialized/deserialized  incorrectly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to