[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16006981#comment-16006981 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-1340: -------------------------------------- GitHub user charlesccychen opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/3086 [BEAM-1340] Move assert_that, equal_to, is_empty to apache_beam.testing.util Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like: `[BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request` - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean verify`. - [ ] Replace `<Jira issue #>` in the title with the actual Jira issue number, if there is one. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf). --- You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/charlesccychen/beam fix-assertthat-util Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/3086.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #3086 ---- commit 0870b2335c5228507bbf216af731e80420ed8624 Author: Charles Chen <c...@google.com> Date: 2017-05-11T18:15:25Z Move assert_that, equal_to, is_empty to apache_beam.testing.util ---- > Remove or make private public bits of the SDK that shouldn't be public > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-1340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1340 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: sdk-java-core, sdk-java-extensions > Reporter: Kenneth Knowles > Priority: Blocker > Labels: backward-incompatible > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > This JIRA is for the many small changes that do not merit their own JIRA > towards getting the SDK's API surface right. For example, removal of > `DoFn.InputProvider` and `DoFn.OutputReceiver`. > While the above is not quite backwards incompatible, succeeding at this task > surely will be. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)