hangc0276 commented on PR #4422: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4422#issuecomment-2744044757
> > @hangc0276 I rebased after the merge of downgrade compat tests; upgrade to 9.2.1 doesn't downgrade nicely. I am not yet sure what can be configured to support compatibility. > > @dlg99 It seems that format version wasn't specified for all databases in Bookkeeper. #4559 will address that for the cases where configuration isn't read from the configuration files. In master branch, reading from configuration files has been broken since #4407 and that's fixed in #4560. After these are merged, it would make sense to resume this PR. Are you interested in continuing this work? Perhaps we could bump directly to latest 9.x of RocksDB, 9.10.0 @lhotari We should hold on to the upgrade before verifying the compatibility issue. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4559 set formatVersion to 5. Does it mean all the old BookKeeper versions are need to upgrade to a version that contains #4559, and then upgrade to the version that upgraded RocksDB to 9.x? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
