allthingssecurity opened a new pull request, #27243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27243

   # Description
   
   [CAMEL-25246](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-25246)
   
   CAMEL-15899 made the Hazelcast consumers register their listener in 
`doStart` and remove it in `doStop`, but `HazelcastQueueConsumer` and 
`HazelcastInstanceConsumer` were not changed:
   
   - **Queue consumer, listen mode (default).** The item listener was added 
from a task on the consumer's executor and never removed. After a stop the 
stopped route kept getting the queue events; after a restart (route controller, 
`master:`/clustered route policy failover, suspend/resume) a second listener 
was added and every event was processed twice, one more time per restart.
   - **Instance consumer.** The membership listener was added in the 
constructor and never removed.
   - **Queue consumer, poll mode.** Only `InterruptedException` was caught 
around `queue.poll`. Any other exception (a client disconnected from the 
cluster, an operation timeout) ended the single polling thread without a log: 
the route stayed started and never consumed again.
   
   This change:
   - `HazelcastQueueConsumer` gets the queue in `doStart`; in listen mode it 
adds the listener there and removes it in `doStop` (the executor is only 
created for poll mode); in poll mode a failed poll goes to the consumer's 
exception handler and the consumer polls again after `pollingTimeout`.
   - `HazelcastInstanceConsumer` adds the membership listener in `doStart` and 
removes it in `doStop`.
   
   Tests:
   - `HazelcastQueueConsumerRestartTest` (new): one listener left after stop, 
one event received twice after a restart.
   - `HazelcastQueueConsumerPollErrorTest` (new): the first poll throws, the 
next item must still be received.
   - `HazelcastInstanceConsumerTest.testStopRemovesListener` (new).
   - `HazelcastQueueConsumerTest` now captures the registered listener again. 
CAMEL-17952 had replaced the captor with a mock that waits inside 
`addItemListener` for the test method, because the listener was registered from 
another thread (a race); the registration is now synchronous in `doStart`, so 
the race is gone.
   - Without the change all new tests fail (`Expected: <1> but was: <2>`, 
`expected: <0> but was: <1>`, `Expected: <1> but was: <0>`, `Wanted but not 
invoked: removeMembershipListener`).
   - With the change the camel-hazelcast suite passes: 237 tests, 1 flake 
(`HazelcastAggregationRepositoryRoutesTest.checkAggregationFromTwoRoutes`, 
which also fails on main and passes on rerun).
   
   # Target
   
   - [x] I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 
uses the `main` branch)
   
   # Tracking
   - [x] If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked 
there is a [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL) filed for 
the change (usually before you start working on it).
   
   # Apache Camel coding standards and style
   
   - [x] I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful 
subject line and body.
   - [ ] I have run `mvn clean install -DskipTests` locally from root folder 
and I have committed all auto-generated changes.
     (I built and tested the affected module, including the formatter and 
import-sort plugins. I did not run the full root build.)
   
   # AI-assisted contributions
   
   - [x] If this PR includes AI-generated code, commits have proper 
co-authorship attribution (e.g., `Co-authored-by` trailers) and the PR 
description identifies the AI tool used.
     This PR was prepared with Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5). The commit 
carries a `Co-Authored-By` trailer.
   
   _Claude Code on behalf of allthingssecurity_
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to