[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14351588#comment-14351588 ]
Ryan Svihla commented on CASSANDRA-7902: ---------------------------------------- Agreed, local RR for local_* is a demonstration of the principle of least surprise if there ever was one. This will have some interesting ramifications for one scenario where someone uses local_* because of slow dc links, but doesn't run nodetool repair because of slow dc links, in theory global read repair firing may have given them their only chance at cross dc consistency (assuming the RR even succeeds). However, I'm not sure it's worth complicating everything for a scenario that involves lots of dubious decisions and will never work properly even with or without global RR. > Introduce the ability to ignore RR based on consistencfy > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7902 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7902 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Reporter: Brandon Williams > > There exists a case for LOCAL_* consistency levels where you really want them > *local only*. This implies that you don't ever want to do cross-dc RR, but > do for other levels. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)