[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14528047#comment-14528047
 ] 

Stefania commented on CASSANDRA-7066:
-------------------------------------

Thank you for your comments, I've pushed a new commit addressing them. I also 
did a bit of renaming and decomposition, the class is now called 
*SSTableOperation* although perhaps it should be called something that better 
conveys the meaning of "transaction involving a group of sstables", so either 
*SSTableTransaction* or *SSTablesTransaction*. Any ideas?

To force the sync of the directory's file descriptor I used the CLibrary 
methods, I hope that is correct.

The notification approach has changed completely and is now based on a 
reference released by a runOnClose, like you suggested. DescriptoryTypeTidy and 
GlobalTidy are merged into one.

I still need to work on fixing the broken tests and implementing the standalone 
tool.  

> Simplify (and unify) cleanup of compaction leftovers
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Stefania
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: compaction
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Currently we manage a list of in-progress compactions in a system table, 
> which we use to cleanup incomplete compactions when we're done. The problem 
> with this is that 1) it's a bit clunky (and leaves us in positions where we 
> can unnecessarily cleanup completed files, or conversely not cleanup files 
> that have been superceded); and 2) it's only used for a regular compaction - 
> no other compaction types are guarded in the same way, so can result in 
> duplication if we fail before deleting the replacements.
> I'd like to see each sstable store in its metadata its direct ancestors, and 
> on startup we simply delete any sstables that occur in the union of all 
> ancestor sets. This way as soon as we finish writing we're capable of 
> cleaning up any leftovers, so we never get duplication. It's also much easier 
> to reason about.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to