[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644616#comment-14644616
 ] 

T Jake Luciani edited comment on CASSANDRA-7066 at 7/28/15 4:37 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. If you lose one of these files you are SOL

So is the option to delete these files and restart and everything is considered 
live?


was (Author: tjake):
bq. If you lose one of these files you are SOL

So is the option to delete these files are restart and everything is considered 
live?

> Simplify (and unify) cleanup of compaction leftovers
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Stefania
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: benedict-to-commit, compaction
>             Fix For: 3.0 alpha 1
>
>         Attachments: 7066.txt
>
>
> Currently we manage a list of in-progress compactions in a system table, 
> which we use to cleanup incomplete compactions when we're done. The problem 
> with this is that 1) it's a bit clunky (and leaves us in positions where we 
> can unnecessarily cleanup completed files, or conversely not cleanup files 
> that have been superceded); and 2) it's only used for a regular compaction - 
> no other compaction types are guarded in the same way, so can result in 
> duplication if we fail before deleting the replacements.
> I'd like to see each sstable store in its metadata its direct ancestors, and 
> on startup we simply delete any sstables that occur in the union of all 
> ancestor sets. This way as soon as we finish writing we're capable of 
> cleaning up any leftovers, so we never get duplication. It's also much easier 
> to reason about.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to