[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696634#comment-14696634
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-7066:
-------------------------------------

bq. I did not switch the hard failure flag to true for any clients except for 
the new sstableutil tool. I am not sure which ones are good candidates, perhaps 
all standalone tools or when we read the snapshot directories?

I more meant for this to be the _default_ behaviour (particularly for 
{{Directories}}) so that any consumers that don't consider this and set the 
appropriate flag can be informed of their mistake (eventually). Ignoring errors 
should be a consciously opted into decision. Of course, we could just hard fail 
the {{Directories}} list immediately if such a flag hasn't been set, and 
perhaps that's a better option still.

I think it would also be better for this behaviour to be defined as an enum as 
opposed to a boolean flag.

Otherwise LGTM. Thanks!

> Simplify (and unify) cleanup of compaction leftovers
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7066
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Stefania
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: benedict-to-commit, compaction
>             Fix For: 3.0 alpha 1
>
>         Attachments: 7066.txt
>
>
> Currently we manage a list of in-progress compactions in a system table, 
> which we use to cleanup incomplete compactions when we're done. The problem 
> with this is that 1) it's a bit clunky (and leaves us in positions where we 
> can unnecessarily cleanup completed files, or conversely not cleanup files 
> that have been superceded); and 2) it's only used for a regular compaction - 
> no other compaction types are guarded in the same way, so can result in 
> duplication if we fail before deleting the replacements.
> I'd like to see each sstable store in its metadata its direct ancestors, and 
> on startup we simply delete any sstables that occur in the union of all 
> ancestor sets. This way as soon as we finish writing we're capable of 
> cleaning up any leftovers, so we never get duplication. It's also much easier 
> to reason about.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to