[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005665#comment-13005665
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-1684:
---------------------------------------------
I'd add that it's pretty clear in my mind that we should end up calling them
'row group' or something alike to avoid the confusion.
> Entity groups
> -------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1684
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
> Fix For: 0.8
>
> Original Estimate: 80h
> Remaining Estimate: 80h
>
> Supporting entity groups similar to App Engine's (that is, allow rows to be
> part of a parent "entity group," whose key is used for routing instead of the
> row itself) allows several improvements:
> - batches within an EG can be atomic across multiple rows
> - order-by-value queries within an EG only have to touch a single replica
> even with RandomPartitioner
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
