[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005713#comment-13005713
 ] 

Dave Revell commented on CASSANDRA-1684:
----------------------------------------

It sounds like everyone agrees.

+1 on Sylvain's idea to call them something other than "entity groups."

> Entity groups
> -------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1684
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>             Fix For: 0.8
>
>   Original Estimate: 80h
>  Remaining Estimate: 80h
>
> Supporting entity groups similar to App Engine's (that is, allow rows to be 
> part of a parent "entity group," whose key is used for routing instead of the 
> row itself) allows several improvements:
>  - batches within an EG can be atomic across multiple rows
>  - order-by-value queries within an EG only have to touch a single replica 
> even with RandomPartitioner

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to