[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17205713#comment-17205713
 ] 

Caleb Rackliffe commented on CASSANDRA-16148:
---------------------------------------------

bq. It would be great if we could get a baseline with and without memoize with 
a 50-100 node cluster with at least 1 node in 3.x.

Would a microbenchmark hammering {{haveMajorVersion3Nodes()}} over 100 
endpoints suffice to allay our fears? (i.e. One comparing trunk to a version of 
the patch w/ a {{volatile}} {{haveMajorVersion3Nodes}}?)

> Test failures caused by merging CASSANDRA-15833
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16148
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16148
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Cluster/Gossip
>            Reporter: Jordan West
>            Assignee: Jordan West
>            Priority: Normal
>
> Three issues were caused by merging CASSANDRA-15833:
> 1. `GossiperTest#testHaveAnyVersion3Nodes` was failing on trunk: 
> https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/53/workflows/95f9f401-1ef8-4b8d-9c64-3703d9669d95/jobs/771
> 2. python dtest ReadRepairTest#test_atomic_writes[blocking] was failing
> 3. In-jvm dtests being worked on as part of CASSANDRA-15977 uncovered an 
> issue with how CASSANDRA-15833 changes interacted with in-jvm dtests running 
> without {{Feature.GOSSIP}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to