[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17242762#comment-17242762
 ] 

Caleb Rackliffe edited comment on CASSANDRA-16261 at 12/2/20, 11:12 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. And, at least since 3.11, we could add a description of the property in the 
documentation for cassandra-env.sh, which already contains definitions of other 
properties, WDYT?

+100 to this

Further, we should make sure the documentation clearly explains when you would 
want/need to raise/lower the value of {{max_pending_flushing_tasks}} in 
response to a metric or set of metrics.


was (Author: maedhroz):
bq. And, at least since 3.11, we could add a description of the property in the 
documentation for cassandra-env.sh, which already contains definitions of other 
properties, WDYT?

+100 to this

> Prevent unbounded number of flushing tasks
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16261
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/Local Write-Read Paths
>            Reporter: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 2.2.x, 3.0.x, 3.11.x, 4.0-beta4
>
>
> The cleaner thread is not prevented from queueing an unbounded number of 
> flushing tasks for memtables that are almost empty.
> This patch adds a mechanism to track the number of pending flushing
> tasks in the memtable cleaner. Above the maximum number (2x the flushing
> threads by default), only memtables using at least MCT memory will be
> flushed, where MCT stands for Memory Cleanup Threshold.
> This patch also fixes a possible problem tracking the memory marked as
> "reclaiming" in the memtable allocators and pool. Writes that complete
> only after a memtable has been scheduled for flushing, did not report
> their memory as reclaiming. Normally this should be a small value of no
> consequence, but if the flushing tasks are blocked for a long period,
> and there is a sufficient number of writes, or these writes use
> a sufficiently large quantity of memory, this would cause the memtable
> cleaning algorithm to schedule repeated flushing tasks because the used
> memory is always > reclaiming memory + MCT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to