[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17376655#comment-17376655
]
Ekaterina Dimitrova edited comment on CASSANDRA-15234 at 7/7/21, 3:41 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading back the thread here and reminding myself of what we discussed I guess
the next step is to hash out a proposal for the user list and get some feedback?
{quote}{quote} I'd personally prefer to hash out here for a week or so, to get
a good proposal to take to the user list, or a couple of competing proposals. I
find public engagements works best when there's a good case to
challenge/consider.
{quote}{quote}
was (Author: e.dimitrova):
Reading back the thread here and reminding myself of what we discussed I guess
the next step is to hash a proposal for the user list and get some feedback?
{quote}bq. I'd personally prefer to hash out here for a week or so, to get a
good proposal to take to the user list, or a couple of competing proposals. I
find public engagements works best when there's a good case to
challenge/consider.
{quote}
> Standardise config and JVM parameters
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-15234
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Local/Config
> Reporter: Benedict Elliott Smith
> Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 5.x
>
> Attachments: CASSANDRA-15234-3-DTests-JAVA8.txt
>
>
> We have a bunch of inconsistent names and config patterns in the codebase,
> both from the yams and JVM properties. It would be nice to standardise the
> naming (such as otc_ vs internode_) as well as the provision of values with
> units - while maintaining perpetual backwards compatibility with the old
> parameter names, of course.
> For temporal units, I would propose parsing strings with suffixes of:
> {{code}}
> u|micros(econds?)?
> ms|millis(econds?)?
> s(econds?)?
> m(inutes?)?
> h(ours?)?
> d(ays?)?
> mo(nths?)?
> {{code}}
> For rate units, I would propose parsing any of the standard {{B/s, KiB/s,
> MiB/s, GiB/s, TiB/s}}.
> Perhaps for avoiding ambiguity we could not accept bauds {{bs, Mbps}} or
> powers of 1000 such as {{KB/s}}, given these are regularly used for either
> their old or new definition e.g. {{KiB/s}}, or we could support them and
> simply log the value in bytes/s.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
