[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17383461#comment-17383461 ]
Ekaterina Dimitrova edited comment on CASSANDRA-15234 at 7/19/21, 5:08 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you [~benedict] and apologize for the late response. There was a lot of multitasking lately. {quote}it would be good to get some initial feedback on this approach to grouping of config options, as optimising the groups is a laborious job that there's no point pursuing if it's otherwise unwelcome. {quote} Absolutely agree with you. I personally have only that question for feedback, whether they would prefer the sections or the nested version you suggested. [~maedhroz], [~mck], [~paulo], [~blerer], [~dcapwell], [~lor...@datastax.com] (maybe [~stefan.miklosovic] as I know he was also interested into this work at some point) - do you have anything to add here as concerns/comment before we bring it to the user list? Any other proposals? Also, should it come from a PMC? Survey or just a discussion mail thread? I am not familiar of any similar discussions before so I am not sure what would be the right approach, I am open for suggestions/advice anyone might have. Thank you. was (Author: e.dimitrova): Thank you [~benedict] and apologize for the late response. There was a lot of multitasking lately. {quote}it would be good to get some initial feedback on this approach to grouping of config options, as optimising the groups is a laborious job that there's no point pursuing if it's otherwise unwelcome. {quote} Absolutely agree with you. I personally have only that question for feedback, whether they would prefer the sections or the nested version you suggested. [~maedhroz], [~mck], [~paulo], [~blerer], [~dcapwell], [~lor...@datastax.com] (maybe [~stefan.miklosovic] as I know he was also interested into this work at some point) - do you have anything to add here as concerns/comment before we bring it to the user list? Also, should it come from a PMC? Survey or just a discussion mail thread? I am not familiar of any similar discussions before so I am not sure what would be the right approach, I am open for suggestions/advice anyone might have. Thank you. > Standardise config and JVM parameters > ------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-15234 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Local/Config > Reporter: Benedict Elliott Smith > Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova > Priority: Normal > Fix For: 5.x > > Attachments: CASSANDRA-15234-3-DTests-JAVA8.txt > > > We have a bunch of inconsistent names and config patterns in the codebase, > both from the yams and JVM properties. It would be nice to standardise the > naming (such as otc_ vs internode_) as well as the provision of values with > units - while maintaining perpetual backwards compatibility with the old > parameter names, of course. > For temporal units, I would propose parsing strings with suffixes of: > {{code}} > u|micros(econds?)? > ms|millis(econds?)? > s(econds?)? > m(inutes?)? > h(ours?)? > d(ays?)? > mo(nths?)? > {{code}} > For rate units, I would propose parsing any of the standard {{B/s, KiB/s, > MiB/s, GiB/s, TiB/s}}. > Perhaps for avoiding ambiguity we could not accept bauds {{bs, Mbps}} or > powers of 1000 such as {{KB/s}}, given these are regularly used for either > their old or new definition e.g. {{KiB/s}}, or we could support them and > simply log the value in bytes/s. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org