[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17479794#comment-17479794
 ] 

Ekaterina Dimitrova commented on CASSANDRA-15234:
-------------------------------------------------

The CI lgtm, there are all known failures. The byteman issues appear again but 
they turned to be general problem with CircleCI. There is already a ticket for 
investigation.

One thing on my mind is - there was a question whether we should use "fail" or 
"abort" if I am not mistaken. I noticed that only recently "abort" was 
introduced, "fail" is widely used in our config. I would suggest to stick to 
"fail" as it is already common for our users. Of course, I will be happy to 
hear if someone has a different perspective on this topic.

Also, my understanding is that [~dcapwell](from offline discussion) and 
[~maedhroz]  are done with their reviews. [~blerer] is swamped at the moment 
but I want to thank him for all his support and feedback at the early stages. 
My understanding is [~mck] is about to do a final review and then we can commit 
when he is ready and of course, I address any potential concerns he might have. 
I will also do another pass tomorrow as the patch is big and widely spread 
around the codebase.

> Standardise config and JVM parameters
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15234
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Local/Config
>            Reporter: Benedict Elliott Smith
>            Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-15234-3-DTests-JAVA8.txt
>
>
> We have a bunch of inconsistent names and config patterns in the codebase, 
> both from the yams and JVM properties.  It would be nice to standardise the 
> naming (such as otc_ vs internode_) as well as the provision of values with 
> units - while maintaining perpetual backwards compatibility with the old 
> parameter names, of course.
> For temporal units, I would propose parsing strings with suffixes of:
> {{code}}
> u|micros(econds?)?
> ms|millis(econds?)?
> s(econds?)?
> m(inutes?)?
> h(ours?)?
> d(ays?)?
> mo(nths?)?
> {{code}}
> For rate units, I would propose parsing any of the standard {{B/s, KiB/s, 
> MiB/s, GiB/s, TiB/s}}.
> Perhaps for avoiding ambiguity we could not accept bauds {{bs, Mbps}} or 
> powers of 1000 such as {{KB/s}}, given these are regularly used for either 
> their old or new definition e.g. {{KiB/s}}, or we could support them and 
> simply log the value in bytes/s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to