[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17703772#comment-17703772
]
Andres de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-18301:
-----------------------------------------------
{quote}Another reason why the setting name IMHO needs to be more explicit about
what it is limiting (storage) (and why this is not just about
downgrading).{quote}
Sure, that needs a better name and detailed documentation, that was just an
example. The point was that using the Cassandra version is probably more
friendly for users. I think it would be a victory for usability if users don't
need to know what sstable version is used in what version of Cassandra.
> Let the user select the sstable version to write
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18301
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18301
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Local/Config, Local/SSTable
> Reporter: Jacek Lewandowski
> Assignee: Jacek Lewandowski
> Priority: Normal
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
