[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13987829#comment-13987829
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-6696:
-------------------------------------------

HBase doesn't have compaction strategies per se, but you can think of this as 
an extension of their STCS strategy.  Still, I don't see any reason why it 
can't apply across the board for us.

bq. It's worth noting that their stripes are not based on vnodes, but on the 
distribution of the data present, with merging/splitting as a given range gets 
too small/big.

Sort of.  They have a special case where you can do "size based stripes" for 
workloads where you have mostly-increasing keys.  (Remember that hbase uses an 
ordered partitioner.)  That doesn't apply to us, but the range-based stripes 
are basically exactly the same as our vnodes here.

> Drive replacement in JBOD can cause data to reappear. 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6696
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6696
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: sankalp kohli
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> In JBOD, when someone gets a bad drive, the bad drive is replaced with a new 
> empty one and repair is run. 
> This can cause deleted data to come back in some cases. Also this is true for 
> corrupt stables in which we delete the corrupt stable and run repair. 
> Here is an example:
> Say we have 3 nodes A,B and C and RF=3 and GC grace=10days. 
> row=sankalp col=sankalp is written 20 days back and successfully went to all 
> three nodes. 
> Then a delete/tombstone was written successfully for the same row column 15 
> days back. 
> Since this tombstone is more than gc grace, it got compacted in Nodes A and B 
> since it got compacted with the actual data. So there is no trace of this row 
> column in node A and B.
> Now in node C, say the original data is in drive1 and tombstone is in drive2. 
> Compaction has not yet reclaimed the data and tombstone.  
> Drive2 becomes corrupt and was replaced with new empty drive. 
> Due to the replacement, the tombstone in now gone and row=sankalp col=sankalp 
> has come back to life. 
> Now after replacing the drive we run repair. This data will be propagated to 
> all nodes. 
> Note: This is still a problem even if we run repair every gc grace. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to