Akshat-Jain commented on code in PR #16781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/16781#discussion_r1687729479


##########
extensions-core/multi-stage-query/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/msq/querykit/WindowOperatorQueryKit.java:
##########
@@ -230,6 +229,13 @@ public QueryDefinition makeQueryDefinition(
             partitionColumnNames
         );
 
+        // We need to pass only the window factories for the window stage 
definition.
+        // Sorting and partitioning are expected to be handled by the shuffle 
spec of the previous stage.
+        final List<OperatorFactory> windowOperatorList = operatorList.get(i)
+                                                                     .stream()
+                                                                     
.filter(operator -> operator instanceof WindowOperatorFactory)

Review Comment:
   Currently, we are passing incorrect shuffle spec, and then explicitly 
passing sort+partition operators. So we're doing unnecessary additional work.
   This PR fixes the shuffle spec, and removes the sort+partition operators.
   
   > there are benefits of further partitioning an existing sort; and that's 
rather cheap....
   
   Right now, MSQ creates the stages based on the list of operator factories we 
get from `Windowing.java` layer. So logic chance for optimisation like this 
should happen there IIUC? So it feels unrelated to this PR to me.



##########
extensions-core/multi-stage-query/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/msq/querykit/WindowOperatorQueryKit.java:
##########
@@ -230,6 +229,13 @@ public QueryDefinition makeQueryDefinition(
             partitionColumnNames
         );
 
+        // We need to pass only the window factories for the window stage 
definition.
+        // Sorting and partitioning are expected to be handled by the shuffle 
spec of the previous stage.
+        final List<OperatorFactory> windowOperatorList = operatorList.get(i)
+                                                                     .stream()
+                                                                     
.filter(operator -> operator instanceof WindowOperatorFactory)

Review Comment:
   Please correct me if I'm wrong though, thanks!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@druid.apache.org

Reply via email to