[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16979366#comment-16979366
 ] 

vinoyang commented on HUDI-354:
-------------------------------

[~gurudatt] Thanks for your remind. These rules are only been applied for 
developers' local env, they only used to find the three style issues we 
discussed before. The formal rules will be added after all modules been 
refactored. I will consider your comments and add the rules carefully.

> Introduce stricter comment and code style validation rules
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-354
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-354
>             Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>
> This is an umbrella issue used to track apply some stricter comment and code 
> style validation rules for the whole project. The rules list below:
>  # All public classes must add class-level comments;
>  # All comments must end with a clear "."
>  # In the import statement of the class, clearly distinguish (by blank lines) 
> the import of Java SE and the import of non-java SE. Currently, I saw at 
> least two projects(Spark and Flink) that implement this rule. Flink 
> implements stricter rules than Spark. It is divided into several blocks from 
> top to bottom(owner import -> non-owner and non-JavaSE import -> Java SE 
> import -> static import), each block are sorted according to the natural 
> sequence of letters;
>  # Reconfirm the method and whether the comment is consistency;
> Each project sub-module mappings to one subtask.
> How to find all the invalidated points?
>  * Add the XML code snippet into {{PROJECT_ROOT/style/checkstyle.xml}} : 
> {code:java}
> <module name="TreeWalker">
>     <!-- add the below modules-->
>     <!-- JAVADOC CHECKS -->
> <module name="JavadocStyle">
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
> </module>
> <module name="JavadocType">
>     <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
> </module>
> <module name="ImportOrder">
>     <!-- Checks for out of order import statements. -->
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <property name="groups" value="org.apache.hudi,*,javax,java,scala"/>
>     <property name="separated" value="true"/>
>     <property name="sortStaticImportsAlphabetically" value="true"/>
>     <property name="option" value="bottom"/>
>     <property name="tokens" value="STATIC_IMPORT, IMPORT"/>
>     <message key="import.ordering"
>       value="Import {0} appears after other imports that it should precede"/>
> </module>
> <module name="RedundantImport">
>     <!-- Checks for redundant import statements. -->
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <message key="import.redundancy"
>       value="Redundant import {0}."/>
> </module>
> <module name="AvoidStarImport">
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
> </module>
> </module>{code}
>  *  Make sure you have installed CheckStyle-IDEA plugin and activated for the 
> project.
>  * Scan the project module you want to refactor and fix all the issues one by 
> one.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to