wzx140 commented on code in PR #5629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/5629#discussion_r974857657
##########
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/common/model/HoodieRecord.java:
##########
@@ -291,59 +284,51 @@ public void checkState() {
}
}
-
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-
- //
- // NOTE: This method duplicates those ones of the HoodieRecordPayload and
are placed here
- // for the duration of RFC-46 implementation, until migration off
`HoodieRecordPayload`
- // is complete
- //
- public abstract HoodieRecord mergeWith(HoodieRecord other, Schema
readerSchema, Schema writerSchema) throws IOException;
+ /**
+ * Get column in record to support RDDCustomColumnsSortPartitioner
+ */
+ public abstract Object getRecordColumnValues(Schema recordSchema, String[]
columns, boolean consistentLogicalTimestampEnabled);
- public abstract HoodieRecord rewriteRecord(Schema recordSchema, Schema
targetSchema, TypedProperties props) throws IOException;
+ /**
+ * Support bootstrap.
+ */
+ public abstract HoodieRecord mergeWith(HoodieRecord other, Schema
targetSchema) throws IOException;
Review Comment:
What this method does is to stitch two record. The logic of bootstrap merge
is fixed. We should not let users customize the implementation of this method,
right?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
