danny0405 commented on issue #19629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/19629#issuecomment-5289055894

   Thanks for raising this. I agree that the configuration semantics are 
surprising: native Parquet logs are logically log files, but their rollover is 
currently controlled by the underlying Parquet writer's `canWrite()`, which 
uses `write.parquet.max.file.size`; `write.log.max.size` is therefore 
ineffective for native-log rollover.
   
   However, I would separate that configuration issue from the performance 
claim. A ~120–132 MiB Parquet file is not normally considered a small file in 
Hudi. In fact, 120 MiB is Hudi's default Parquet target and is intended to be a 
generally read/write-friendly size. The observed ~132 MiB also follows from the 
120 MiB target plus the writer's default 10% compression-sizing allowance.
   
   The comparison with a ~245 MiB inline log is not completely 
apples-to-apples. The inline file is an appendable Hudi log container bounded 
by the Flink mini-batch, while the native file is compressed, columnar, and 
write-once. Dividing 245 by 132 does not by itself prove that the same workload 
creates 1.85x as many files; we should compare actual file counts and records 
per file, together with write throughput, file-open/list operations, read 
latency, and compaction time.
   
   I would also avoid automatically applying the existing 1 GiB 
`write.log.max.size` default to native Parquet logs. With the current sizing 
allowance, that could change the default physical size from ~132 MiB to roughly 
1.1 GiB, which may reduce metadata operations but can also reduce read 
parallelism and increase retry/recovery granularity.
   
   So I think the independent-sizing requirement is valid, but a dedicated 
option such as `write.native.log.max.file.size`, defaulting/falling back to the 
current Parquet target for compatibility, would be safer than directly reusing 
`write.log.max.size`. The performance motivation should ideally be supported 
with workload measurements rather than treating ~120 MiB Parquet files as 
inherently unfriendly.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to