commits  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] fix(spark): correct data-skipping translation for LIKE 'prefix%' (StartsWith) [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct data-skipping translation for LIKE 'prefix%' (StartsWith) [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct data-skipping translation for LIKE 'prefix%' (StartsWith) [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct data-skipping translation for LIKE 'prefix%' (StartsWith) [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(spark): demote spurious per-write INFO logs to debug [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): demote spurious per-write INFO logs to debug [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): demote spurious per-write INFO logs to debug [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): demote spurious per-write INFO logs to debug [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): demote spurious per-write INFO logs to debug [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: update javadoc spark-submit examples to Spark 3.5 / Scala 2.12 [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update javadoc spark-submit examples to Spark 3.5 / Scala 2.12 [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update javadoc spark-submit examples to Spark 3.5 / Scala 2.12 [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update javadoc spark-submit examples to Spark 3.5 / Scala 2.12 [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: update javadoc spark-submit examples to Spark 3.5 / Scala 2.12 [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): cover low-coverage small classes in spark datasource [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(spark): correct self-recursive equals in ProcedureParameterImpl [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct self-recursive equals in ProcedureParameterImpl [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct self-recursive equals in ProcedureParameterImpl [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct self-recursive equals in ProcedureParameterImpl [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): correct self-recursive equals in ProcedureParameterImpl [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored Avro serializer and deserializer forks into family modules [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored Avro serializer and deserializer forks into family modules [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored Avro serializer and deserializer forks into family modules [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(spark): consolidate the vendored 3.x Avro serde forks into hudi-spark3-common [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add streaming source and writer support coverage [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add file-group reader read path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add write and commit path coverage [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add catalog and V2 table DDL coverage [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(spark): add stored procedure coverage [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(hadoop-common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of s… [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string conc… [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(cli): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string c… [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(common): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support insert overwrite operations w/ row writer code path [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support insert overwrite operations w/ row writer code path [hudi] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of strin… [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(hadoop-mr): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support for SCD2 with hudi [hudi] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add metrics to track corrupted blocks and rollback blocks [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add metrics to track corrupted blocks and rollback blocks [hudi] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Avoid Rerunning entire write process again in case of table services failure [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Avoid Rerunning entire write process again in case of table services failure [hudi] via GitHub
• (hudi) branch master updated: test: handle expected OCC conflict in concurrent Java writer test (#19124) vhs
• Re: [I] Add equals and hashcode override for Predicate static classes [hudi] via GitHub
• (hudi) branch master updated: feat: [HUDI-9553] Add equals and hashCode override to Predicate inner classes (#13481) vhs
• (hudi) branch master updated: perf(common): replace BitSet with a fixed word array in the ported bloom filter (#19140) vhs
• [PR] refactor(flink): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string co… [hudi] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(flink): use SLF4J parameterized logging instead of string concatenation [hudi] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages