rymanluk commented on a change in pull request #790: nimble/store: Fix nimble 
store behavior when CCCDs exceed static defined limit
URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-nimble/pull/790#discussion_r403511125
 
 

 ##########
 File path: nimble/host/src/ble_store_util.c
 ##########
 @@ -230,16 +315,43 @@ ble_store_util_delete_oldest_peer(void)
 int
 ble_store_util_status_rr(struct ble_store_status_event *event, void *arg)
 {
+    int rc = BLE_HS_EUNKNOWN;
+    ble_addr_t peer_id_addr;
+    int num_peers;
+
     switch (event->event_code) {
     case BLE_STORE_EVENT_OVERFLOW:
         switch (event->overflow.obj_type) {
-            case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_OUR_SEC:
-            case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_PEER_SEC:
-            case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_CCCD:
-                return ble_gap_unpair_oldest_peer();
-
-            default:
-                return BLE_HS_EUNKNOWN;
+        case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_OUR_SEC:
+        case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_PEER_SEC:
+            return ble_gap_unpair_oldest_peer();
+        case BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_CCCD:
+            if ((rc = ble_gap_unpair_oldest_peer()) == BLE_HS_ENOENT) {
 
 Review comment:
   I was thinking to call here other version of `unpair_oldest` which would 
take as a parameter `ble_addr_t ` of device which we don't want to unpair.
   If the only device which could be unpair is the one provided, then unpair is 
not done and this function returns error.
   
   In such a case we know that we cannot store CCC and there is nothing we can 
do more here. All the other code is not needed then.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to