nuttxpr commented on PR #14039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14039#issuecomment-2404595788

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   **No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.**
   
   **Missing Information:**
   
   * **Summary:**
       * Lacks a clear explanation of *why* the change is necessary. While the 
description mentions issues with `libuv` and potential integer overflows, it 
doesn't clearly articulate the problem being solved and its impact. 
       * Needs to be more specific about the functional part of the code being 
changed (e.g., which files, functions).
   * **Impact:**
       *  The impact section is incomplete. It only mentions "FS poll" but 
doesn't address all the required points:
           * Is this a new feature, a bug fix, or an optimization?
           * What is the impact on users? Will they need to adapt to this 
change?
           * What is the impact on documentation? Is an update required?
           * Are there any security implications?
           * Are there any backward or forward compatibility concerns? 
   * **Testing:**
       * **Insufficient Detail:** Simply stating "sim & qemu" is not enough. 
           * Specify the host operating system, CPU architecture, and compiler 
used.
           * Provide specific details about the simulator configurations.
           * For QEMU, specify the target architecture and board configuration.
       * **Missing Logs:** The "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs 
after change" sections are empty. Provide actual log output demonstrating the 
issue before the change and the improvement after the change.
   
   **Recommendations for Improvement:**
   
   1. **Clarify the Problem:**  In the Summary, clearly state the problem being 
solved. Explain why the existing `poll` implementation is incorrect according 
to the `man` page and how it negatively impacts `libuv`.
   2. **Explain the Solution:** Provide more detail on *how* the code changes 
address the problem. What specific modifications are made to `fs_poll.c`?  How 
does `result_independent_of_operands` relate to the overall fix?
   3. **Complete the Impact Section:** Address all the points listed in the 
requirements. Be specific about any potential compatibility issues or required 
changes for users.
   4. **Provide Detailed Testing Information:** Include:
       * Host OS, CPU, and compiler details.
       * Simulator/QEMU configurations.
       * **Actual log output** before and after the change to demonstrate the 
fix.
   
   By providing this missing information, your PR will be much stronger and 
easier for the NuttX maintainers to review. 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to