nuttxpr commented on PR #15079: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15079#issuecomment-2523993561
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with an Empty Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary. Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more detailed. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the changes. The use cases provided are helpful. * **Impact Section Started:** The impact section identifies the affected architectures, which is a good start. * **Testing Information Provided:** Testing information is present, mentioning the specific configurations and examples used. **Weaknesses (and suggestions for improvement):** * **Missing Issue References:** If this PR addresses any specific issues in the NuttX or NuttX Apps repositories, those should be linked in the Summary. * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** The Impact section needs to be significantly expanded. Each of the sub-points (user impact, build impact, hardware impact, documentation, security, compatibility) should have a "YES" or "NO" answer followed by a description *even if the answer is NO*. For example: "Impact on build (will build process change)? NO (No changes to the build process are required)." * **Insufficient Testing Detail:** While testing configurations are mentioned, the provided logs are placeholder text. Actual log output demonstrating the functionality before and after the change is essential. Ideally, these logs should show both successful operation and any error handling. Be specific about the tests performed and the expected results. Quantify the results if possible (e.g., "Frequency measured within 0.1% accuracy"). * **Commit Messages Could Be Improved:** While functional, the commit messages could be more descriptive. Instead of "Add pulse counter support," consider a message like "Implement PCNT driver for ESP32S2, adding support for pulse counting and quadrature decoding." This provides more context and makes the commit history easier to understand. **Example of a more complete Impact section:** * Is new feature added? YES (Pulse counter peripheral support) * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? YES (Users can now access the PCNT peripheral through the provided driver interface. New configuration options may be required in their applications and device trees.) * Impact on build (will build process change)? YES (New Kconfig options will be available to enable the PCNT driver. Users will need to select these options in their defconfigs to use the new functionality.) * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? YES (New drivers are added specifically for ESP32, ESP32S2, ESP32S3, ESP32C6, and ESP32H2. No changes to existing hardware are required, but new hardware using these features can now be supported.) * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? YES (Documentation updates are required to explain how to use the new PCNT driver, including configuration options and API usage. This documentation has been provided in [location of documentation]). * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO (No known security implications are introduced by this change.) * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO (This change is backward compatible and does not impact interoperability with other features.) * Anything else to consider? None. By addressing these weaknesses, the PR will be much stronger and easier for reviewers to evaluate. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
