nuttxpr commented on PR #15147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15147#issuecomment-2536536037

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.  While it provides a 
brief summary, it lacks crucial details.
   
   Here's what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**
       * **WHY:**  The summary states *what* was changed (removing spaces and 
adding tabs), but not *why*.  What problem did this solve? Was it for code 
style consistency, fixing a parsing issue, or something else?
       * **HOW:** It mentions adding tabs, but doesn't specify where or how 
many. Consistency is key in code style, so the specifics are important.  What 
was the standard adopted?
       * **Related Issues:**  Any related NuttX issues should be linked.  Even 
if there isn't a directly related issue, it's good practice to explain why one 
wasn't created if the change addresses a bug.
   
   * **Impact:** While stating "none" is concise, it's unlikely there's *zero* 
impact.  Consider these:
       * **Build:**  Did the build system need any adjustments to handle the 
changes to the Kconfig files?  Even seemingly minor changes can sometimes have 
ripple effects.
       * **Documentation:** If this change affects how Kconfig files are 
formatted, the coding style guidelines might need updating to reflect the new 
standard.
   
   * **Testing:** This section is completely empty.  It's crucial to provide 
evidence that the changes work as intended.  At minimum, include:
       * **Build Host:**  Your development environment (OS, CPU architecture, 
compiler version).
       * **Target(s):** The architectures and boards where the code was tested.
       * **Logs:**  "Before" and "after" logs aren't strictly required for 
trivial whitespace changes, but demonstrating that the configuration system 
still functions correctly after the modifications is essential. A simple 
successful build log would suffice.
   
   
   In short, the PR needs significantly more detail to meet the NuttX 
requirements.  Focus on explaining the *why*, *how*, and providing evidence of 
testing.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to