nuttxpr commented on PR #15231: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15231#issuecomment-2547699083
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. The provided information is insufficient. Here's a breakdown: * **Summary:** While it mentions the change (replacing a big lock with a small lock), it lacks crucial details. *Why* is this change necessary? What problem does it solve? How exactly does the small lock mechanism work? What specific functions in `esp32_rtc.c` are modified? There's no mention of related issues. * **Impact:** Simply stating "esp32_rtc" doesn't explain the impact. All the yes/no questions need to be answered explicitly. Does this change affect how users interact with the RTC? Does it alter the build process, affect other hardware components, require documentation updates, have security implications, or impact compatibility? * **Testing:** "ci" is not sufficient. What specific CI tests were run? "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. Provide actual logs demonstrating the issue before the change and the corrected behavior after the change. Include details about the build host and target used for testing (OS, architecture, board, configuration). This PR needs significantly more detail to be considered. The maintainer will likely request the missing information. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
