cederom commented on PR #19250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/19250#issuecomment-4859805885

   > > > > > @xiaoxiang781216: @linguini1 why close this pr?
   > > > > 
   > > > > @linguini1: This PR, its text, and the users comments are entirely 
generated by Claude Code.
   > > > 
   > > > @xiaoxiang781216: ALL my pr done in this year do by AI, does this mean 
I can't contribute to NuttX?
   > > 
   > > 
   > > @linguini1: Every one? I assume you are reviewing the output,
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216: Yes, ALL my patch include pr is generated by Claude 
Code, but of course I review each line change carefully and do the test before 
I request AI create the pr.
   > 
   > > @linguini1: but this PR is highly suspicious of someone who did not 
properly review the output. It is an account with almost no activity and no 
prior contributions to NuttX.
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216: @ricardgb please answer @linguini1's concern.
   > 
   > > @linguini1: I personally don't think anything entirely AI generated 
should be in the NuttX kernel; it should be an assistance tool. But, that is 
not up to me. In this case, I closed the PR because it looks like it was 
generated by someone with no understanding of what they're doing.
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216: We need accept the trend: all developers will utilize AI 
to generate material (code, commit, documentation, pr) sooner or later.
   > 
   > > @linguini1: Also, there continues to be legal issues with licensing of 
AI-generated code.
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216: it's new topic, we should consult Apache legal team.
   
   @xiaoxiang781216 I agree with @linguini1 here, and looking at the mailing 
list, most of the community - we want to keep NuttX a project developed by a 
community of passionates, professionals, and enthusiasts.
   
   "all developers will utilize AI to generate material (code, commit, 
documentation, pr) sooner or later" - yes we cannot avoid that, but we do NOT 
need to "accept the trend", we may just acknowledge the problem but not become 
part of the problem :-)
   
   This is similar to "rewrite everything in Rust" "trend" - we may acknowledge 
the problem and still not become part of the problem :-)
   
   Let people rewrite everything in Rust, but from scratch, away from here. The 
same with AI :-)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to