jackjlli commented on issue #13629: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/13629#issuecomment-2233941528
@tibrewalpratik17 Even for upsert tables if there is a need to uplift it's still possible that segments will be assigned to a different server. And what's more, we couldn't use 0 here, as `0` denotes the current pinot-server is still responsible for the target partition but the data is not being consumed right now, which leads to false alarm to be triggered (in LinkedIn we do set up the alert on monitoring the value of this metric and the alert will be triggered as long as the value is non-0. I'd suggest getting more evidence from your side, say when a new consuming segment for the same partition is initialized, check the log to make sure if the metric is actually created. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
